Re:Things we learned about LLMs in 2024
by vbezhenar on Wednesday January 01, 2025 @03:50AM
(#42564809)
You are supposed to have connections with knowledgeable people, so you can call them and ask for advice. That's how it works without computers.
Re:Things we learned about LLMs in 2024
by FooBarWidget on Wednesday January 01, 2025 @11:56AM
(#42567258)
Did you miss the parts where I said that I only have time when they're closed, and they're only open when I'm most busy?
Have you never seen knowledgeable people get things wrong, and having to verify them?
Did you miss the part where they cost money, and I better come in as prepared as possible?
I really don't get these knee-jerk averse reactions. Are people deliberately reading past my assertions that I double check LLM outputs for everything critical?
LLMs are infinitely patient, don't think I am dumb for asking certain things, consider all the information I feed them, are available whenever I need them, have a wide range of expertise, and are dirt cheap compared to professionals.
That they might hallucinate is not a blocker most of the time. If the information I require is critical, I can always double check with my own research or with professionals (in which case the LLM has already primed me with a basic mental model so that I can ask quick, short, targeted questions, which saves the both of us time, and me money). For everything else (such as my curiocity on why TCM works, or the correct spelling of a word), LLMs are good enough.