Re:Interesting Interview with DeepSeek's CEO
by nprateem on Tuesday December 31, 2024 @10:21AM
(#42559194)
You don't think FB are trying to neuter an emerging threat? They're kneecapping what could have been a trillion dollar company if it was more difficult to replicate their tech.
Re:Interesting Interview with DeepSeek's CEO
by coliveira on Tuesday December 31, 2024 @04:18PM
(#42561894)
If they're smart, and of course they are, they're not releasing the latest they have. They're releasing something enough to show everyone that they're at parity or better compared to OpenAI. I imagine they already have internal models that exceed the open source one, so there's no real advantage in copying what they released.
Re:Interesting Interview with DeepSeek's CEO
by cma on Tuesday December 31, 2024 @07:05PM
(#42562841)
They would have to pay more to get researchers that don't publish.
Re:Interesting Interview with DeepSeek's CEO
by mike_hearn on Wednesday January 01, 2025 @08:43AM
(#42565963)
I was talking about open weight models more than papers, but OpenAI hardly publishes papers anymore and don't seem to struggle to get researchers. Anthropic are clearly doing a lot of special sauce given Claude 3.5 Sonnet's performance on coding, yet the papers they publish are mostly safety related. So I'm not sure that's really true anymore.
Re:Interesting Interview with DeepSeek's CEO
by mistercheph on Wednesday January 01, 2025 @02:54PM
(#42568744)
Open models will win, OpenAI and the other regulatory capture gamers that want to hoard their precious will certainly be an interesting footnote for the history books.
I really wonder how long the current era of giving models away for free can last. How is this sensible from a business perspective? Facebook got burned by iOS and now engage in what would otherwise look like irrational behavior to avoid being locked into a supplier again, but even then, they don't really need to give Llama away for free. They could train and use it for themselves just fine.