News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:President Jimmy Carter has passed away by bb88 on Monday December 30, 2024 @06:32PM (#42554807)
What's super interesting along this line of thought are the events that happened in Flint, Michigan circa 2014 when the local government (who were unelected emergency managers) decided to switch the water source of Flint. This water reacted with the lead pipes causing lead levels to spike in the water supply.

It's not the outsized risk of lead levels people are necessarily worried about. It's the outsized risk of some health risk that gets covered up, lied about, or dismissed by those in charge. There appears to be a high correlation between nuclear accidents and government and political coverups.

Re:President Jimmy Carter has passed away by zizee on Monday December 30, 2024 @07:43PM (#42555244)
Well, back to my original point that the challenges are political in nature.

Nuclear has one of the lowest mortality rates per megawatt hour. It would be even better if only modern reactor designs were considered.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/494425/death-rate-worldw...

Re:President Jimmy Carter has passed away by bb88 on Tuesday December 31, 2024 @02:09PM (#42560998)
But also the highest potential for mass disaster. Even the so-called "safe" designs like pebble bed reactors have had issues with dust from the pebbles grinding against each other.
Re:President Jimmy Carter has passed away by zizee on Wednesday January 01, 2025 @01:43AM (#42564381)
This is just not true. A hydroelectric dam failure has demonstrably more potential for mass disaster https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Banqiao_Dam_failure