News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by rmc on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @08:49AM (#4255439)
Not photos of people, of course

Exactly, "not of people (in the bathroom)". Would you take photos of people in a bathroom. If you're male, would you take photos of men at the urinal?

Does everyone in Europe avoid using their smartphone except in the privacy of their own home?

No of course not.

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by randallsquared on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @09:55AM (#4255660)
If you're male, would you take photos of men at the urinal?

I am male, and no, that would seem weird to me. On the other hand, I wouldn't feel that I could legitimately assault someone who was.

No of course [people don't avoid using smartphones in public]

You say "of course", but I can't figure out how universal cameras are consistent with a culture that fears cameras in public.

If a dozen people on a subway car are using smartphones (and therefore could be taking video or photos right now), how do others react?

Does the answer change when a dozen people are wearing Google Glass?

Also, why do people seem dismissive of questions like these? :)

Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by rmc on Tuesday July 17, 2012 @10:25AM (#4255761)
When you're using a smartphone, you're usually pointing it towards the ground / 45° angle. You're not in a position to take good photographs of people. So others know you're not taking photos.
Re:Physical assault by McDonald's for wearing Digital Eye Glass by mtmn62 on Wednesday July 18, 2012 @12:41AM (#4259382)
unless you hit record and then "check your voice mail"...