https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14236401/evidence-o...
Do you really think any proper investigation can be completed in the time it took them to close this?
For the record, that time was 40 seconds from the time they arrived at the scene. They couldn't even have had the firearm ownership information by that point.
The parents also found blood spatter where it shouldn't have been if it were a suicide, and signs of a struggle in the bathroom.
There needs to be a proper investigation. The duty of care has not been met.
As for the investigation, your link says it was worked on, and is still ongoing. A private autopsy was completed, and from what I can gather, it did not prove the conspiracy either. What specifically are you proposing the investigation do, then?
Obviously they wouldn't do it if you didn't have any evidence showing that the previous conclusion was wrong, and I have not seen any presented here.
> What would convincing evidence even look like to spur the necessary action after an investigation has been closed solely based on a medical examiner's report?
I've already answered this twice, suggesting what direct, non-circumstantial evidence might look like. Now is the time to present some. A bunch of text conflating many unrelated events and spreading your personal conspiratorial, self-serving narrative, unfortunately isn't that.
Have you seen any direct, non-circumstantial evidence? Witnesses? Videos? Documents ordering a hit? I haven't. And you unfortunately ignored this question previously, so now it must be re-asked. Please don't ignore this question again.