News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTuber won DMCA fight with fake Nintendo lawyer by dete... by AlotOfReading on Monday December 30, 2024 @01:10PM (#42551879)
The fact of copyright is different from the term of copyright. If we changed the term to 1 year tomorrow, there would still be arrangement and transcription copyrights. I also dislike the term, but it's a separate discussion.
Re:YouTuber won DMCA fight with fake Nintendo lawyer by dete... by mort96 on Monday December 30, 2024 @01:30PM (#42552098)
I think it would be reasonable for someone to own future performances of a piece based on a transcription they made for a year, or a couple of years. I don't think it's okay for them to own it until 70 years after their death. Given that the term is what it is, it is unreasonable for transcriptions to be covered by copyright. The two things are inseparable.