Re:Neuters: Lightweight front end to Reuters News
by oneeyedpigeon on Monday December 30, 2024 @05:52AM
(#42548220)
> I also don't try to visit websites built with latest web features using browsers that are clearly not trying to support those features.
But good websites will let you, that's the point.
Re:Neuters: Lightweight front end to Reuters News
by ahmedfromtunis on Monday December 30, 2024 @05:58AM
(#42548249)
I find the nyt's website far more informative and way easier to use and navigate than this.
So why is neuter a good website while nyt's isn't?
Re:Neuters: Lightweight front end to Reuters News
by oneeyedpigeon on Monday December 30, 2024 @06:09AM
(#42548292)
Well, tbf, I'm speculating based on the evidence provided. But, if NYT provides a poor—or non-existent—experience to anyone, for example, without JavaScript enabled, then it fits my definition of "bad".
NYT doesn't have to hinder its innovative efforts to create informative content just because of a couple of folks who refuse to admit that tech evolves over time.
I understand that ads can be annoying, and for that I use ad blockers where necessary; but for everything else, I appreciate the advancements in the web tech capabilities that enable the creation of amazing stuff.