Re:TWISTED: The dramatic history of twisted-pair Ethernet
by Aloha on Monday December 30, 2024 @11:12AM
(#42550596)
I very much agree - it has the advantage of not being an electrically shared medium however, which is one of the things that made it superior to 10Base2 or 10Base5
Here is some interesting documentation from the original StarLAN Hub -
https://vtda.org/docs/computing/AT&T/AT&T_Starlan_10_Hub.pdf
There is also some neat and ancient documentation still lovingly preserved on the NCR website -
https://onlinehelp.ncr.com/Retail/Workstations/Wiring/Ethern...
Re:TWISTED: The dramatic history of twisted-pair Ethernet
by thro1 on Monday December 30, 2024 @10:02PM
(#42555995)
-> https://onlinehelp.ncr.com/Retail/Workstations/Wiring/Ethern... (NCR Ethernet Communications Wiring Guide pdf 1998)
Which brings me to one thing that puzzled me about the video. In the part starting from 10:37 https://youtu.be/f8PP5IHsL8Y?t=637 it describes STARLAN as specifying two pairs of wires, one for transmit and one for receive. But naturally you can't really have full duplex without a switch at the other end of the wire; and yet the STARLINK "Network Extension Unit" is described as a hub (and indeed it seems that the first Ethernet switches/multiport bridges didn't ship until 1989-1990). So when at 12:10 https://youtu.be/f8PP5IHsL8Y?t=730 the video seems to suggest that STARLINK being half-duplex was a step back from the original plan, I don't see how that can be the case: I assume that first-generation STARLINK was never intended to provide full duplex, and the two pairs of wires were just reserved for future upgrades. That seems compatible with what Richard Bennett says from 12:29 . That's still interesting, though, because it suggests that the STARLINK contributors must have had switches in mind back in 1983.