So if everyone is responsible for their own actions, why are you including Ukraine in this context? After all this is in isolation Russia committing (yet another) crime.

You are the one picking and choosing here.

> Everyone is responsible for their own actions- otherwise you get into an endless spiral of "I did that just because you did the other thing first, so it's ultimately your fault".

Why are you then mentioning Ukraine in this context if not to send us into this endless spiral?

Given the northstream 2 precedent it is actually the most likely outcome that the same entity / franchise behind ns2 is behind the cable cutting incidents as well.

"two things we're cut, so it's most likely the same people cut both" is not a reasonable assumption without evidence.

And we know the Russian ship cut the data cables, so if your assumption was true, it means Russia also cut nordstream. So why bring up Ukraine cutting nordstream? It makes no sense.

>I was just observing that Ukraine committed a blatant and extremely serious act of sabotage against European infrastructure

Even if it was Ukraine (it wasn't - read this about Putin friend's tanker https://www.businessinsider.com/nord-stream-mystery-minerva-... , tankers seem to be the favorite Russian sea-platform for sabotage), the Nord Stream majorly - 51% - owned by Russia thus it would be a valid target for Ukraine.

>You can't be indignant for one sabotage and ignore the other.

You can and should. There is huge difference between valid targets and invalid ones. By attacking Ukraine Russia made itself into a valid target for Ukraine. Finland and Estonia aren't valid targets for Russia.

I didn’t know about that. I listen French national news radio daily but apparently missed it (!). Googled it and it seems it’s not even controversial. Thanks you to mentionnent it. I’m not trying to troll or putting oil on the fire but I’m quite disappointed it didn’t have more coverage or aftermath analysis like they regularly do for consequences of the war.