Re:Fake Nintendo lawyer is scaring YouTubers, and its not cl...
by lesuorac on Friday December 27, 2024 @07:54PM
(#42527573)
Well, keep in mind Content ID [1] is in response to Viacom v YouTube [2] despite Viacom not winning (largely on the grounds that Viacom itself didn't know which works were copyright infringement so how could YouTube).
So, the system exists to placate large rightsholders. It's not going to be modified to cause them problems.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_ID#History
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viacom_International_Inc._v._Y...
You'd think that YouTube could at least categorize those who perform and record unambigiously public domain works and advise people using automatic match software to be _very_ sure there's an infringement.
Someday if I have time and patience, I may try to see what legal options I have against one of these deep-pocket companies who are making false (and libelous) claims about the recordings I have made. They're accusing me of theft, and it's provably false.
What's annoying is sometimes I'm on the road and don't get to responding to the request for several weeks.