Re:Does current AI represent a dead end?
by sebastianz on Friday December 27, 2024 @06:04PM
(#42526888)
> What’s the difference between what you describe and what’s needed for a fresh hire off the street, especially one just starting their career?
The fresh hire has the potential that after training and working for a while to become a much more valuable and reliable senior.
Re:Does current AI represent a dead end?
by jsjohnst on Friday December 27, 2024 @06:13PM
(#42526943)
> has the potential
Good choice of wording! Definitely not a given though.
The bell curve is much wider for humans than LLMs, I don't think this needs to be said.
Re:Does current AI represent a dead end?
by fzeroracer on Friday December 27, 2024 @10:24PM
(#42528305)
The difference is that a LLM is like hiring a worst-case scenario fresh hire that lied to you during the interview process, has a fake resume and isn't actually named John Programmer.
Re:Does current AI represent a dead end?
by jsjohnst on Friday December 27, 2024 @10:26PM
(#42528316)
Entirely disagree.
Re:Does current AI represent a dead end?
by intended on Friday December 27, 2024 @11:51PM
(#42528694)
Real talk? The human can be made to suffer consequences.
We don't mention this in techie circles, probably because it is gauche. However you can hold a person responsible, and there is a chance you can figure out what they got wrong and ensure they are trained.
I can’t do squat to OpenAI if a bot gets something wrong, nor could I figure out why it got it wrong in the first place.
What’s the difference between what you describe and what’s needed for a fresh hire off the street, especially one just starting their career?