News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Does current AI represent a dead end? by viraptor on Friday December 27, 2024 @04:04PM (#42526025)
Yes, it can tell a difference, up to the point where the boundaries are getting fuzzy. But the same thing applies to us all.

Can you tell this is a dishwasher? https://www.amazon.com.au/Countertop-Dishwasher-Automatic-Ve...

Can you tell this is a drawing of a glass? https://www.deviantart.com/januarysnow13/art/Wine-Glass-Hype...

Can you tell this is a toy? https://www.amazon.com.au/Theo-Klein-Miele-Washing-Machine/d...

Re:Does current AI represent a dead end? by magpi3 on Friday December 27, 2024 @07:03PM (#42527270)
If I am limited to looking at pictures, then I am at the same disadvantage as the LLM, sure. The point is that people can experience and understand objects from a multitude of perspectives, both with our senses and the mental models we utilize to understand the object. Can LLMs do the same?
Re:Does current AI represent a dead end? by viraptor on Friday December 27, 2024 @10:45PM (#42528388)
That's not a disadvantage of LLM. You can start sending images from a camera moving around and you'll get many views as well. The capabilities here are the same as the eye-brain system - it can't move independently either.
Re:Does current AI represent a dead end? by cynicalpeace on Saturday December 28, 2024 @08:36PM (#42536620)
That's exactly the point- generally intelligent organism are not just "eye-brain systems"
Re:Does current AI represent a dead end? by viraptor on Saturday December 28, 2024 @10:56PM (#42537391)
You really need to define what you mean by generally intelligent in that case. Otherwise, if you require free movement for generally intelligent organisms, you may be making interesting claims about bedridden people.
Re:Does current AI represent a dead end? by cynicalpeace on Wednesday January 01, 2025 @08:08PM (#42570715)
Bedridden people are not just eye-brain systems.