Re:Why history is always political
by DiscourseFan on Friday December 27, 2024 @03:26PM
(#42525724)
The conditions of possibility of that extraodinary technical development are political. cf Marx, Capital vol 1
[ Parent
| on HN ]
The conditions may be, but the development itself isn't, and the prior work which that development references and depends on likewise isn't (and had political conditions of its own quite possibly unrelated to the present ones).
Re:Why history is always political
by DiscourseFan on Friday December 27, 2024 @04:24PM
(#42526172)
It is still shrouded by the spectre of the political
Even if so, that's a different claim from the content being political.
Re:Why history is always political
by DiscourseFan on Friday December 27, 2024 @06:12PM
(#42526935)
its not not-political
Sure, like Earl Gray tea is tinged by what you're listening to. It tastes a bit different if you have Beethoven on versus Miles Davis. Therefore, although tea obviously isn't musical, it's not non-musical, either.
Re:Why history is always political
by DiscourseFan on Monday December 30, 2024 @02:11PM
(#42552438)
Both the music and the tea are produced by and through market capitalism which depends on a particular configuration of the state to operate efficiently, ie politically. Its just the case that the most efficient configuration is also the one beyond politics.