News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sherlock: Hunt down social media accounts by username acr... by II2II on Wednesday December 25, 2024 @01:19PM (#42510204)
That second example pretty much demonstrates why it is so dangerous. There were attitudes that were commonplace 30 years ago that are now considered racist, in many cases because they were racist, that people don't subscribe to today. I imagine the same can be said about 10 years ago. People's values change. We should not be giving them life sentences when the have reformed their attitudes and behaviors, otherwise the incentive to reform is taken away.
Re:Sherlock: Hunt down social media accounts by username acr... by idontlikeirc on Wednesday December 25, 2024 @11:05PM (#42513031)
One example of this I can think of is a show from the late 90's which used the word "spaz" very liberally, which was already iffy at the time but not fully demonized. Using it nowadays could be considered a major point of contention towards your image. Words like Gypsy and Retard are more recent inclusions in this field.
Re:Sherlock: Hunt down social media accounts by username acr... by s1artibartfast on Wednesday December 25, 2024 @11:56PM (#42513210)
When did spaz go out of favor? I was completely unaware it became taboo.
Re:Sherlock: Hunt down social media accounts by username acr... by Pigalowda on Thursday December 26, 2024 @07:34AM (#42514818)
It was deemed ableist by the White Knight Censorship company a few years ago. Something about cerebral palsy.