News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel shareholders file case asking ex CEO, CFO to return... by kllrnohj on Tuesday December 24, 2024 @07:49AM (#42501591)
> but in 3.5 years couldn't do the actual goal

...which means he was allowed to release maybe 1 if even that of Intel's bread and butter, CPUs. They have a lead time of somewhere between 3-5 years. And that's not including fab development, which takes even longer.

So was he "burning billions" or was he investing billions into what made Intel a dominant force in the first place? We'll probably never know, but 3.5 years isn't anywhere close to long enough in this industry.

Re:Intel shareholders file case asking ex CEO, CFO to return... by godzillabrennus on Tuesday December 24, 2024 @08:59AM (#42501927)
Investment of cash without profits to make those investments is still a burn…

Pat still deserved longer. Intel is basically a storied brand that needs to be run like a startup because all of its legacy revenue products/models are dying.

Re:Intel shareholders file case asking ex CEO, CFO to return... by kllrnohj on Tuesday December 24, 2024 @01:12PM (#42503686)
> Investment of cash without profits to make those investments is still a burn…

there was, though? That's why net income averaged zero, and cash on hand is flat the last 4 years. He didn't run Intel at a loss.