News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Conda: A Package Management Disaster?. Parent comment

Re:Conda: A Package Management Disaster? by lrog on Friday December 20, 2024 @02:52AM (#42469117)
Can you recommend any good article / comparison of uv vs poetry vs conda?

We've used different combinations of pipx+lockfiles or poetry, which has been so far OK'ish. But recently discovered uv and are wondering about existing experience so far across the industry.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Conda: A Package Management Disaster? by NeutralForest on Friday December 20, 2024 @02:28PM (#42474115)
From my experience, uv is way better and it's also PEP compliant in terms of pyproject.toml. Which means in cas uv isn't a big player in the future, migrating away isn't too difficult.

At the same time, poetry still uses a custom format and is pretty slow.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Conda: A Package Management Disaster? by LarsDu88 on Friday December 20, 2024 @07:58PM (#42476645)
I wrote an overview, but didn't post benchmarks https://dublog.net/blog/so-many-python-package-managers/
[ Parent | on HN ]