News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:1-800-ChatGPT by lxgr on Wednesday December 18, 2024 @03:42PM (#42454917)
That's because we're currently largely not using them correctly, i.e. hooked up to RAG instead of hoping that they've memorized enough of the training data verbatim, which is arguably a waste of neurons in a foundational model.

Imaging being graded on your ability to quote exact line numbers of particular parts of your codebase as a senior software engineer without being able to look at it!

LLMs are not, in isolation, a search product.

Re:1-800-ChatGPT by lethibo on Thursday December 19, 2024 @02:34PM (#42464928)
Agreed Did you try eyelevel.ai It has made great strides in this Rag battle (ref the attached). Ready to discuss this further with you, and open an account on Ground x for you to test it: https://www.groundx.ai/