An individual F1 engine outperforms an individual Raptor 2/3.

I just realized that after hitting post. Edited my comment.

Depends on the metric.

F1 is still the winner in sea level thrust per engine (6770 kN vs 2660kN).

Raptor is more efficient (with higher sea level and vacuum specific impulse); it also has a much higher thrust density -- those 2660kN come from a nozzle only 1.3m in diameter, vs the F1's 3.7m diameter.

The higher thrust density and smaller size means that you can fit 33 raptors in a ~9m diameter circle and end up with a stage with double the thrust of the ~10m diameter Saturn V.

Raptor also has twice the thrust/weight ratio of the F-1.

The line you quoted specifically says F-1 engine, not Saturn V rocket.

SpaceX Starship is closer to the (failed) N1 Soviet Rocket which should have been the Saturn V competitor.

The N1, with its 30 NK-15 engine would have made it more powerful than the Saturn V and its 5 F-1 engine, but less powerful than SpaceX "Super Heavy" with its 33 Raptor engines.

Another similarity is that the NK-15 engine and the Raptor are both staged combustion engines, while the F-1 uses the simpler open cycle design. The F-1 is also much more powerful than both the Raptor and NK-15, that's why the Saturn V has only 5 of them.

The similarities end there, fortunately.

The difference is, we have better QC procedures and modern flight control electronics.

F-1 vs. Raptor question is only for American engines, not the world ones. If by "most powerful" you mean engine thrust.