News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Modelica. Parent comment

Re:Modelica by wolvesechoes on Tuesday December 17, 2024 @04:14AM (#42439733)
"Another up-and-coming solution is Julia's simulation ecosystem"

Still not comparable with Modelica that has proper specification, including graphical representation of models.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Modelica by michaeltiller on Tuesday December 17, 2024 @10:20AM (#42442048)
JuliaSim does have graphical representation, a GUI and an IDE. But, granted, it is also a commercial product, not open source.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Modelica by wolvesechoes on Wednesday December 18, 2024 @02:01PM (#42453628)
But this representation is exclusive to JuliaSim, is it not? MTK package didn't have equivalents of Dialog, Icon and Diagram annotations the last time I checked.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Modelica by michaeltiller on Friday December 20, 2024 @09:15AM (#42471222)
It is exclusive to JuliaSim. But the tools generate MTK compatible component models so, once built, they can be used with MTK.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Modelica by xgdgsc on Wednesday December 18, 2024 @08:20AM (#42450216)
There' s a Chinese company also using Julia and Modelica https://www.tongyuan.cc/product/MWorks . They have projects like https://github.com/Suzhou-Tongyuan/syslab-deploy using https://discourse.julialang.org/t/syslabcc-suzhou-tongyuans-... .
[ Parent | on HN ]