On what grounds? He changed the statement the box makes by the user. It's silly compliance but O think you really have to go further than this for contempt.

nope, in a simple lexicon, all you have to do is piss off any member of the court, this stands for most jurisdictions

https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q=contempt%20of%20court

As a process server, this pleases me greatly

Depends. If an item is ordered to be removed from a store, there isn't an assumption that the shelf be left empty.

changing the wrapper is not removing the item, and the congruity of WithPinapple compared to WordPress is a common obfusication, method.

this would be indirect contempt, of court order to the prejudice of the courts authority to mandate injunctive relief

One key difference that I suspect the court will consider is that this isn’t a shelf.