News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Byte Latent Transformer: Patches Scale Better Than Tokens by entilzha on Saturday December 14, 2024 @03:01PM (#42419088)
I don't believe so, or at least if someone tried it didn't work well enough that I remember :). Some of the motivation for the architecture changes in encoding patches stemmed from finding FLOP efficient ways to express relationships between byte sequences. E.G., having a long context window makes sense when dealing with tokens, but you don't need as long as an attention window if you're attending byte sequences to make patch representations, since the patch representations will implicitly be part of a longer context window in terms of number of patches.
Re:Byte Latent Transformer: Patches Scale Better Than Tokens by cs702 on Saturday December 14, 2024 @04:23PM (#42419554)
Thanks for the quick reply!

Interesting. I would have thought one of those "minimum viable" RNNs (like https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01201) would have been ideal for this. I might tinker a bit with this :-)