Re:McKinsey and Company to pay $650M for role in opioid crisis
by bdangubic on Saturday December 14, 2024 @12:21PM
(#42418261)
we can go glass-half-full-glass-half-empty back and forth ad nausem here for sure :)
bottom line though, the then government (which is soon to be now government) went full ballistic on us during COVID times and vaccine mandates affected many lives
Re:McKinsey and Company to pay $650M for role in opioid crisis
by bdangubic on Saturday December 14, 2024 @01:22PM
(#42418586)
“only” 98% compliance should tell you all you need to know whether people are “forced” or not… the prospect of losing your job might not be that alarming for HN-average-person but…
Re:McKinsey and Company to pay $650M for role in opioid crisis
by Retric on Saturday December 14, 2024 @05:15PM
(#42419847)
You can hit 100% compliance by actually firing people. 98% means lot’s of scary memo’s and little action.
So yea 98% says a lot about how toothless this all was.
Re:McKinsey and Company to pay $650M for role in opioid crisis
by Retric on Saturday December 14, 2024 @01:01PM
(#42418495)
Only some parts of the government “required” their employees to get vaccinated, the entire US government didn’t. Even those bits only hit ~98% compliance.
When you volunteer to work for someone you’re agreeing to do what they want or quit, that’s by definition a choice. When many private employers had the same requirements complaining about overreach by the government is misplaced, it’s at most overreach by employers.
A career extends beyond a job means that you can transition to something related outside the FBI. If there some aspect of a job you dislike then quit.