Re:Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era
by aithrowawaycomm on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @12:57PM
(#42390644)
No, we need a scientific understanding of autonomous intelligent decision-making. The problem with “agentic AI” is the same old “Artificial Intelligence, Natural Stupidity” problem: we have no clue what “reasoning” or “intelligence” or “autonomous” actually means in animals, and trying to apply these terms to AI without understanding them (or inventing a new term without nailing down the underlying concept) is doomed to fail.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era
by robotresearcher on Thursday December 12, 2024 @12:35PM
(#42401287)
They don’t mean anything precise, and don’t need to. They describe a bag of behaviors with overlapping properties that we observe animals/people doing.
‘Intelligent’ is exactly as precise as ‘funny’ or ‘interesting’. It’s a label for a cluster of observations of another agent’s behavior. It entails almost nothing about how those behaviors are achieved.
This is of course only an opinion, but it’s my professional opinion after thirty five years in the AI business.