News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Judge Refuses to Allow Sale of Infowars to The Onion by capybaraStorm on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @11:56AM (#42389823)
The "megaphone" that caused $~1B+ in damage was a deranged child murderer.

Since the murderer was a broke nobody, they instead went after someone who defamed the dead. The cultural leanings of Alex Jones are easy to attack and he had deep pockets.

The premise is basically Jones defamed the living by lying about the livings factual representation of the dead. But that is only a deceptive legal spin of what actually happen, that Jones defamed the dead. But you can't win judgements for defaming the dead, so you just say you've defamed the living by saying they're lying about the dead.

It gives me incredible joy to know Jones has mitigated this effect with the same legal deception used against him.

Re:Judge Refuses to Allow Sale of Infowars to The Onion by timerol on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @12:10PM (#42390031)
Repeatedly accusing the families of being actors lying about the event sounds like defamation of living people to me
Re:Judge Refuses to Allow Sale of Infowars to The Onion by capybaraStorm on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @12:31PM (#42390309)
The argument the lawsuit wasn't about defending the honor of the dead kids while going after the nearest deep pockets is pretty questionable. I don't condone what Jones said but it seems pretty clear to me the reason the parents wanted the money was because they felt Jones was selling a false story about their children.