> it's out of line with other defamation judgements.

This point made me curious so I quickly looked around. Fox News paid a $787.5 million settlement [1] for making false claims about Dominion. Given that this happened as the trial was about to start, it's reasonable to assume that Fox News expected to lose even more if the issue went to trial. And that's for a party that arguably would have followed court orders, something Alex Jones refused to do.

Next in line is Rudy Giuliani, who was ordered to pay $150 million for defaming two election workers [2]. If Alex Jones defamed 12 families then it comes out roughly the same.

[1] https://edition.cnn.com/2023/04/18/media/fox-dominion-settle...

[2] https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/rudy-giuliani-def...

All these cited claims seem political and extreme to me. I can't find a non-political example where the judgement this extreme.

Depp v Herd defamation was around $10m.

There was a single victim in Depp vs Herd.

The acts of defamation were extreme, clear cut, repetitive and devoid of remorse. I for one like knowing that if someone ruins my reputation with cruel lies in such a malicious and relentless way that they may face extreme consequences.

Those are also extreme though.

> Yeah, we don't have that in Sweden except for criminal acts

Sweden isn't the only Nordic country.

Just look up speeding tickets in Finland and Norway.