Re:The total price of the Digg acquisition was around $16 mi...
by Tuna-Fish on Friday July 13, 2012 @01:16AM
(#4238343)
Not really an expert, but they probably are, but the patent would probably also get overturned pretty easily.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The total price of the Digg acquisition was around $16 mi...
by zakhar on Friday July 13, 2012 @02:18AM
(#4238476)
IANAL, but wouldn't websites like bash.org be prior art for a “click a button to vote up a story” functionality? I'd be interested to see the exact wording, if anyone can find a link to the patent in question.
Re:The total price of the Digg acquisition was around $16 mi...
by sharken on Friday July 13, 2012 @03:06AM
(#4238585)
Looks like it is this patent
Re:The total price of the Digg acquisition was around $16 mi...
by runehol on Friday July 13, 2012 @04:43AM
(#4238877)
If that's the patent in question, it's so specific as to be useless.
The first claim, which all other claims depend on, only claims the invention when 1) The voting patterns are being displayed in a "swarm interface" 2) The "thickness of a line" is used for visualizing the number of votes
I don't believe that any of the modern sites use a swarm interface at all, and if someone wanted to show a swarm interface, by using something other than the thickness of a line for the visualization, you've sidestepped the patent.
It's hard to believe someone paid good money for this.