News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Good union types in Go would probably need types without ... by umanwizard on Monday December 09, 2024 @09:03AM (#42366345)
In reality it turned out to be a worse C in many ways, because it has a GC and fat runtime (ruling it out for a huge chunk of what you might use C for) and lacks any kind of metaprogramming capability (yes, C macros are bad, but they're useful/necessary a lot of the time).

Regardless of their intention, it turned out to be a competitor to Java, not C.

There are no comments on this comment yet.