The only reason Kurds would say they don't want their country is Turkey.
But rather the fact that it seems difficult to imagine such a state being set up without further conflict / ethnic cleansing.
This is a misuse of the term.
Even the Syrian Kurds don’t want independence, rather just autonomy as part of a multiethnic Northern region.
Doesn't have to be full-scale independence. I think "stable, legal regional autonomy" was probably included in what the commenter meant by "their own land".
As opposed to the halfway / fully isolated / unstable situation they've had up until now.
However, Turkey to the north is really not keen on the Kurds having any territory, so they'll do whatever they can to frustrate this.
> However, Turkey to the north is really not keen on the Kurds having any territory, so they'll do whatever they can to frustrate this.
It's not true that Turkey is not keen on the Kurds having any territory because their friendly relations with KRG is a counter example.
Could it work that if the Kurds have their own 'official' region (either country, or province with-in another country) Turkey (Türkiye) would simply throw money at people to move to it?
If there aren't any Kurds living with Turkey's borders, would that be a win for Turkey?