Re:Romanian court annuls result of presidential election fir...
by lukan on Friday December 06, 2024 @04:53PM
(#42344920)
"but as long as he didn't ship boatloads of fake ballots it doesn't warrant cancelling the election."
Why do you think you can decide for romanians? They made their voting laws - he violated them. They sort it out.
Re:Romanian court annuls result of presidential election fir...
by Wytwwww on Friday December 06, 2024 @06:31PM
(#42345735)
Why are you even commenting here if you don't believe that people should ever share their opinions on anything?
But yeah not a great look for Romania and its political system either way if they have to invalidate the elections and throw away the votes of a significant proportion of the population to stop them from electing a pro-russian/fascist candidate...
Re:Romanian court annuls result of presidential election fir...
by lukan on Friday December 06, 2024 @07:50PM
(#42346238)
If they want to elect him, they can do so the proper way the next time.
Re:Romanian court annuls result of presidential election fir...
by scott_w on Friday December 06, 2024 @06:03PM
(#42345532)
Say he violates voting laws and becomes president as a result. Do you get a situation like in the USA where the police just say “well, you won so all crimes are effectively expunged,” or do you have the even more insane situation of the president being prosecuted for violating electoral laws during his campaign?
Re:Romanian court annuls result of presidential election fir...
by maeil on Friday December 06, 2024 @09:04PM
(#42346649)
Turns out China (or here, Russia) infiltrated the country, waged an enormous disinformation campaign and succeeded by getting their chosen candidate elected? "Tough luck, it's too late now, should just stand by and watch the country get taken over".
No.
I still believe that the main "problem" was that the front runner party that has been in the 2nd round for 10s of years and which has the prime minister as the candidate, didn't make it to the 2nd round. Someone wanted this fixed. Obviously the prime minister who was 3rd in the 1st round made declarations in support of the ruling.