Re:TikTok divestment law upheld by federal appeals court
by jerf on Friday December 06, 2024 @12:56PM
(#42342224)
If you're "conspiracy theory"-ometer is asking you for evidence for the proposition that "countries do not simply lie back and fervently hope for things to go their way but take concrete actions to advance their interests", your meter is tuned waaaaaaaay too sensitively. Whether that's a conspiracy is up to your definition, but that it's a theory that somehow needs substantiation is absurd. It's a plain and obvious fact of the world. Organizations of any size in general do not generally just sort of sit back and hope things go their way, but take action. "People take actions to advance their own goals" is not a "conspiracy theory".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:TikTok divestment law upheld by federal appeals court
by shadowmanif on Saturday December 07, 2024 @07:51AM
(#42349456)
The irony is that people with this overly sensitive "conspiracy theory"-ometer largely have it from the amount of influence campaigns ran on them.