Re:TikTok divestment law upheld by federal appeals court
by daniel_reetz on Friday December 06, 2024 @11:50AM
(#42341440)
E2E doesn't fix the government mandated backdoors, which were implicated in this attack. Check out the last line of this article:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/04/politics/us-telecom-providers...
Re:TikTok divestment law upheld by federal appeals court
by JumpCrisscross on Friday December 06, 2024 @12:01PM
(#42341570)
> E2E doesn't fix the government mandated backdoors, which were implicated in this attack
Of course it does. It removes them. This problem can be solved with a bit of legislation.
Re:TikTok divestment law upheld by federal appeals court
by rangestransform on Friday December 06, 2024 @12:33PM
(#42341959)
We should just make the three letter agencies go dark then, and hopefully jobless too
Re:TikTok divestment law upheld by federal appeals court
by JumpCrisscross on Friday December 06, 2024 @12:51PM
(#42342169)
> just make the three letter agencies go dark then, and hopefully jobless too
Good. Red teaming. This is exactly what I’d say, too, if I wanted to tank a federal E2E bill. It splits the national security bloc by unnecessarily vilifying the IC, the one group that doesn’t traditionally bother with the lawful part of lawful intercept.
We can make it harder. Switch our telecoms to E2E by default.
We’ve shown the current set-up can be exploited by adversaries. It’s not a huge leap given the prevalence of encrypted messaging apps. And you can market it as a finger to the deep state on one side and a limit on the executive to the other.