News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on ChatGPT Pro. Parent comment

Re:ChatGPT Pro by lolive on Friday December 06, 2024 @02:41AM (#42337371)
Won’t name my company, but we rely on Palantir Foundry for our data lake. And the only thing everybody wants [including Palantir itself] is to deploy at scale AI capabilities tied properly to the rest of the toolset/datasets.

The issues at the moment are a mix of IP on the data, insurance on the security of private clouds infrastructures, deals between Amazon and Microsoft/OpenAI for the proper integration of ChatGPT on AWS, all these kind of things.

But discarding the enterprise needs is in my opinion a [very] wrong assumption.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ChatGPT Pro by everybodyknows on Friday December 06, 2024 @01:14PM (#42342428)
Is the Foundry business the reason for the run up of PLTR this year?

https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/PLTR

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ChatGPT Pro by lolive on Saturday December 07, 2024 @03:01AM (#42348081)
Very personal feeling, but without a datalake organized the way Foundry is organized, I don’t see how you can manage [cold] data at scale in a company [both in term of size, flexibility, semantics or R&D]. Given the fact that IT services in big companies WILL fail to build and maintain such a horribly complex stack, the walled garden nature of the Foundry stack is not so stupid.

But all that is the technical part of things. Markets do not bless products. They bless revenues. And from that perspective, I have NO CLUE.

[ Parent | on HN ]