Re:The Pitchforks Are Coming for Us Plutocrats (2014)
by tdeck on Friday December 06, 2024 @01:41AM
(#42337040)
I have no personal connection to this issue at all apart from living in the US. Rather than fixating on your perception that I do, maybe you could contribute to the discussion by actually answering any of the questions I raised in your reply to my comment?
Re:The Pitchforks Are Coming for Us Plutocrats (2014)
by tptacek on Friday December 06, 2024 @01:44AM
(#42337055)
I just answered your question directly.
Re:The Pitchforks Are Coming for Us Plutocrats (2014)
by dllthomas on Friday December 06, 2024 @12:17PM
(#42341771)
"This is not money you were ever going to pay."
I don't see why. Don't out-of-pocket maximums only apply to covered care?
Re:The Pitchforks Are Coming for Us Plutocrats (2014)
by tptacek on Friday December 06, 2024 @01:16PM
(#42342443)
Is that what happens when Medicare, which pays for the overwhelming majority of all surgeries, denies anesthesiology bills exceeding CMS limits? Seniors just pay for their own anesthesia? No.
Re:The Pitchforks Are Coming for Us Plutocrats (2014)
by dllthomas on Friday December 06, 2024 @02:23PM
(#42343253)
I honestly don't know, but if not I would like to understand why.
* This is not money you were ever going to pay.
* There is no such thing as cutting anesthesia off early because of a billing dispute.
You are getting rolled by a professional trade group for some of the most highly compensated, well-off people in the American economy. We might just as well take up arms against the rapacious costs of M&A litigation in the finance industry.