News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A pro-science, pro-progress, techno-optimistic health textbook from 1929. Parent comment

Re:A pro-science, pro-progress, techno-optimistic health tex... by stevenAthompson on Thursday December 05, 2024 @09:59AM (#42328842)
> You don't actually know that, because you keep missing the point.

It takes two people to communicate. If you have trouble communicating your point maybe try rephrasing it, instead of resorting to ad hominem attacks.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A pro-science, pro-progress, techno-optimistic health tex... by foxglacier on Monday December 09, 2024 @03:56PM (#42370477)
Sorry for adding fuel to the fire, but that's not an ad hominem. He's criticizing what you did, rather than what you are.
[ Parent | on HN ]