Re:A pro-science, pro-progress, techno-optimistic health tex...
by marcosdumay on Wednesday December 04, 2024 @01:22PM
(#42320338)
On the doses people were recommending it's very clearly unsafe, known to have killed a few people, and marked so on the usage instructions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A pro-science, pro-progress, techno-optimistic health tex...
by TheFreim on Wednesday December 04, 2024 @02:13PM
(#42320899)
I agree, which is why someone should say "unsafe dosages of ivermectin" or "ivermectin in formulations unsafe for human consumption" instead of speaking of a widely used drug as per itself "unsafe" without qualification. Making over-generalized statements will lead to people rightly reject what you're saying, leaving room for them to be misinformed about the actual reality of the situation.
Re:A pro-science, pro-progress, techno-optimistic health tex...
by marcosdumay on Wednesday December 04, 2024 @03:09PM
(#42321504)
Oh, I do agree with this.