Re:South Korean president declares emergency martial law
by ExoticPearTree on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @04:23PM
(#42311635)
From what I could understand from the news:
- the current parliament and the president are at war: the president vetoed any law the parliament passed because he doesn't like them. The parliament voted the budget and cut funding to whatever the president wished for.
- all political parties voted to have the martial law order revoked.
I don't know what the fallout of this will be, but the curent president of South Korea is toast. He went all in and lost big time.
Re:South Korean president declares emergency martial law
by hyeonwho4 on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @04:05PM
(#42311416)
The military tried to physically prevent the National Assembly from meeting on a vote to disband the martial law. If they had been successful, the elected National Assembly would have no power. That's about as close to a military takeover as you can get without shots being fired.
Re:South Korean president declares emergency martial law
by vundercind on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @04:48PM
(#42311925)
Declaration of martial law isn't necessarily a coup attempt, in the same way that walking into the parliament building—hell, maybe even walking in armed—isn't necessarily a coup attempt.
On the other hand, declaration of martial law or walking armed into parliament might well be a coup attempt.
Context and intent is everything.
Re:South Korean president declares emergency martial law
by sooheon on Thursday December 05, 2024 @11:28AM
(#42329661)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-coup
Korean law specifically prohibits presidential interference with the legislative branch even under martial law, a clause written in blood. The first thing Yoon did was try to lock down the legislature and arrest party leaders. This is a blatantly unconstitutional self coup attempt.
Do you consider Justin Trudeau's invocation of the Emergencies Act in Canada to have been a coup?