News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Amazon Aurora DSQL. Parent comment

Re:Amazon Aurora DSQL by everfrustrated on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @02:01PM (#42309890)
>the lack of multiple databases per cluster

I don't think that will matter. This feels much more like DynamoDB where you're charged for GB used/stored and no infra cost, so no reason to nest databases

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon Aurora DSQL by Edwinr95 on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @02:04PM (#42309927)
Isolation can be quite important. I work with a micro services architecture, where we assign a database per service.

That makes it very easy to manage access to sensitive data.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon Aurora DSQL by adobrawy on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @02:17PM (#42310088)
You do not need logical database isolation if you have even stronger isolation with virtual clusters. The pricing and quota will be important factor for that use case.
[ Parent | on HN ]