News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Court Recognizes DMCA Safe Harbor in Universal v Groovesh... by Locke1689 on Wednesday July 11, 2012 @02:39PM (#4230662)
Bare minimum, guys.
Re:Court Recognizes DMCA Safe Harbor in Universal v Groovesh... by ebrenes on Wednesday July 11, 2012 @03:36PM (#4231011)
This reminds me of that part in Office Space where the manager complains about the waitress' "15 pieces of flare". I can only imagine the comedy of having it apply to legal and other areas of life...

IRS: It says here you only paid the bare minimum in taxes, what do you have to say for yourself?

Fire marshall: It seems you only have the minimum fire protection requirements. Looks like you're haphazardly endangering people by not going above and beyond

Building inspector: Hmm, it seems you only have the bare minimum of one access ramp. If you really cared to honor the disability act, you'd have 2, at least 3. There are other buildings that have all these special facilities you know?

Re:Court Recognizes DMCA Safe Harbor in Universal v Groovesh... by Locke1689 on Wednesday July 11, 2012 @05:03PM (#4231470)
I just had to say something before everyone was talking about the minimum number of bears that need to be around for someone to be guilty under the DMCA. Personally, I would be more worried about the bear maximum, but IANAL.