Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by LittleTimothy on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @02:48AM
(#42303867)
"You didn't use enough compute in your reproduction of our methods" is kind of a funny criticism today. Well yeah, you're Google. Sorry guys, no reviewing of our methodology unless you own a cloud. It wouldn't surprise me if it's true that more compute, more pre-training etc. provides a lot of utility, but that does make it difficult to verify the work.
One interesting aspect of this though is vice-versa, whilst Google has oodles of compute, Synopsys has oodles of data to train on (if, and this is a massive if, they can get away with training on customer IP).
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip
by dogleg77 on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @11:20AM
(#42307827)
Chip designers run EDAtools on premises. How would EDA companies have access to customer data? Maybe for debugging purposes under NDA, but that won't allow training on customer IP.
One interesting aspect of this though is vice-versa, whilst Google has oodles of compute, Synopsys has oodles of data to train on (if, and this is a massive if, they can get away with training on customer IP).