News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip by LittleTimothy on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @02:48AM (#42303867)
"You didn't use enough compute in your reproduction of our methods" is kind of a funny criticism today. Well yeah, you're Google. Sorry guys, no reviewing of our methodology unless you own a cloud. It wouldn't surprise me if it's true that more compute, more pre-training etc. provides a lot of utility, but that does make it difficult to verify the work.

One interesting aspect of this though is vice-versa, whilst Google has oodles of compute, Synopsys has oodles of data to train on (if, and this is a massive if, they can get away with training on customer IP).

Re:Jeff Dean Responds to EDA Industry about AlphaChip by dogleg77 on Tuesday December 03, 2024 @11:20AM (#42307827)
Chip designers run EDAtools on premises. How would EDA companies have access to customer data? Maybe for debugging purposes under NDA, but that won't allow training on customer IP.