> (B) David Mayer de Rothschild (born 1978), British adventurer, ecologist, and environmentalist

There will be your reason it is filtered. When you ask a question like "who is my Country in debt to anyway?", it might be the Rothschild family [1]:

> From 1895 through 1907 they loaned nearly $450,000,000 (equivalent to $14,700,000,000 in 2023) to European governments.

Even to this day they continue to own significant debt.

Wouldn’t the shadowy all powerful cabal simply have ChatGPT respond with an answer about any of the other 3 David Mayer’s?

But I guess anti-semitism is too much fun to not engage in.

Or, you know, actually censor the name "Rothschild" or references to the Rothschild family, which it doesn't. I guess the shadowy all powerful cabal didn't think of that.

> Or, you know, actually censor the name "Rothschild" or references to the Rothschild family, which it doesn't. I guess the shadowy all powerful cabal didn't think of that.

It depends what you are trying to sensor. Saying something like "The Rothschild family control everything and are lizard people" can be laughed off, but something closer to reality could be very sensitive.

It doesn't need to be a massive conspiracy theory either, it could just be something like a medical condition leaked online.

If you think this kind of stuff doesn't happen, the Royal Family of the UK are quite open about it [0]. The law literally does not apply to them [1]. They go to a lot of effort to hide their wealth and financial matters [2].

[0] https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/mountbatten-diaries-blocked...

[1] https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn05...

[2] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/05/how-the-brit...

> Wouldn’t the shadowy all powerful cabal simply have ChatGPT respond with an answer about any of the other 3 David Mayer’s?

Based on the assumption that the network produces something untrue/compromising about David Mayer: Re-training an LLM is exceptionally computationally heavy, not to mention time consuming, even if they could find the data that caused it to train this way. There is no guarantee it would unlearn this either. What they likely mostly do is build upon already trained models.

If the threat to chatGPT is great enough (legal, financial, etc), it is far easier to filter the output. It would look a lot like this. Even when you try to trick the model, when the output tokens match it cuts off.

> But I guess anti-semitism is too much fun to not engage in.

This has nothing to do with anti-semitism. We're talking about a family with more wealth than most nation states. I'm not commenting on why or how, but it is simply a factual statement.