Re:Sol-Ark manufacturer reportedly disables all Deye inverte...
by oefrha on Sunday December 01, 2024 @12:16AM
(#42286374)
That first sale has to be legal for the subsequent resales to be legal.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sol-Ark manufacturer reportedly disables all Deye inverte...
by walterbell on Sunday December 01, 2024 @12:36AM
(#42286454)
https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/articles/u-s-supreme-co...
> U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Books Printed and Sold Abroad May Be Freely Resold in the U.S. Because the Copyrights Are Exhausted Under the First-Sale Doctrine
Re:Sol-Ark manufacturer reportedly disables all Deye inverte...
by oefrha on Sunday December 01, 2024 @12:50AM
(#42286499)
Now do sale of region-free DVD players in the U.S.
In any case, it’s perfectly legal for me to make and sell a geo-locked device in another country, and it is the importer’s problem if fails to work elsewhere. That doesn’t tend to happen with physical books, obviously.
Re:Sol-Ark manufacturer reportedly disables all Deye inverte...
by walterbell on Sunday December 01, 2024 @12:57AM
(#42286522)
Post-sale disabling of inverter devices is different than lack of support. The Supreme Court case on textbooks arose from profits on textbook arbitrage. New device-related caselaw will depend on a plaintiff that makes enough from device arbitrage to fund a lawsuit.
Re:Sol-Ark manufacturer reportedly disables all Deye inverte...
by ImPostingOnHN on Sunday December 01, 2024 @09:09AM
(#42288518)
The sale was legal in that neither the seller nor the buyer committed any criminal actions.
It sounds like Sol-Ark would have preferred that Deye not sold the products, and may even be able to sue Deye, but nobody illegally acquired anything.