and unfortunately we are in warming planet where Malaria's host vector range is going to increase as temperatures continue to rise, destroying Malaria is one of the greatest possible morale goods we could pursue.
Those are long dead already, aren't they? I guess the right question to be asked when thinking about taking action is which one is going to kill more in the near future.
> unfortunately we are in warming planet where Malaria's host vector range is going to increase as temperatures continue to rise.
This is a fair point and should be accounted when thinking about the impact on malaria
> Destroying Malaria is one of the greatest possible morale goods we could pursue
It's great for sure, maybe among the greatest ones around health, but I don't think it'd go over peace.
*: e.g. heartworm in dogs