Re:I Stopped Using Kubernetes. Our DevOps Team Is Happier Th...
by wbl on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @08:58AM
(#42256114)
Addressability is not accessibility . It's easy to control how services talk to each other through NetworkPolicy.
Re:I Stopped Using Kubernetes. Our DevOps Team Is Happier Th...
by withinboredom on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @01:35PM
(#42258470)
This… sounds remarkably like the problems kubernetes solves.
Re:I Stopped Using Kubernetes. Our DevOps Team Is Happier Th...
by AtlasBarfed on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @01:45PM
(#42258561)
single tank point of failure should be
single YAML point of failure
mobile autocorrect is super "helpful"
Re:I Stopped Using Kubernetes. Our DevOps Team Is Happier Th...
by withinboredom on Thursday November 28, 2024 @03:21AM
(#42263547)
I have completely tanked a kubernetes cluster before. Everything kept working. The only problem was that we couldn’t spin up new containers and if any of the running ones stopped, dns/networking wouldn’t get updated. So for a few hours while we figured out how to fix what I broke, not many issues happened.
So sure, I can kinda see your point, but it feels rather moot. In the cluster, there isnt much that is a single point of failure that also wouldn’t be a point of failure in multiple clusters.
I can see security teams getting uppity about that.
Also budgetary and org boundaries, cloud providers, disaster recovery/hot spares/redundancy/AB hotswap, avoid single tank point of failure.