Re:Cybertruck's Many Recalls Make It Worse Than 91 Percent o...
by Tostino on Tuesday November 26, 2024 @08:02AM
(#42245331)
All new cars are required to have backup cameras, so manufacturers have used that "freedom" to change car shapes. Not only Tesla.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cybertruck's Many Recalls Make It Worse Than 91 Percent o...
by liontwist on Tuesday November 26, 2024 @11:20AM
(#42246997)
I can’t understand why a regulatory group would feel the need to make that a requirement. That vastly increases the cost to develop a vehicle.
Why can’t I choose that feature as a consumer? Did their brother in law have the patent for backing cameras?
Re:Cybertruck's Many Recalls Make It Worse Than 91 Percent o...
by Tostino on Tuesday November 26, 2024 @11:36AM
(#42247151)
I get it, but the reasoning behind it was that little kids kept getting run over by their parents / family members because they couldn't see them.
The cost at this point is pretty negligible.
Mandate went into effect (in the US) in 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backup_camera#Mandates
Re:Cybertruck's Many Recalls Make It Worse Than 91 Percent o...
by liontwist on Tuesday November 26, 2024 @12:01PM
(#42247435)
Thanks for the info.
Yeah the cost is negligible if you are already planning to have a screen running chrome on Ubuntu server, but I hope it was still an option not to have that.
Re:Cybertruck's Many Recalls Make It Worse Than 91 Percent o...
by mrguyorama on Tuesday November 26, 2024 @12:51PM
(#42247990)
Uh no. Pretty much every single backup camera on every single vehicle is the exact same little module that produces analog video and literally just runs a component cable to the head unit which has a standardized analog video input.
Zero software required.