News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Beh... by sqeaky on Sunday November 24, 2024 @03:38AM (#42226761)
I've never seen someone say "woke bullshit", who didn't then jump straight into wild nonsense conspiracy theory or extreme bigotry. Thank you for not disappointing.

We simply don't have all the facts, this is one article. I would also suggest you consider adjusting how you think about the world, there's an unreasonable alignment with people who speak like you've chosen to and people who act deeply maliciously. If you don't want to get confused for someone deeply malicious consider gathering more facts before you speak.

Re:C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Beh... by knorker on Sunday November 24, 2024 @03:46AM (#42226787)
> jump into wild nonsense conspiracy theory or extreme bigotry.

Did they? The commenter was referring to "Simple Sabotage Field Manual", by the CIA. It's a very commonly cited list of actions to take, or that someone would take, to impede the effectiveness of an organization.

The commenter was not saying "CIA did it, and birds aren't real".

Re:C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Beh... by sqeaky on Sunday November 24, 2024 @04:42AM (#42226965)
Yeah appealing to that book is literally conspiracy nonsense when you're talking about a group of engineers trying to do good engineering. That appeal fundamentally means that there are people trying to actively sabotage a thing, that by itself is a conspiracy theory particularly when you consider that much of the standards committee has been doing standardization work for ages, and all of them are experienced engineers focused on engineering.

Prima facie claiming that people who are joining an optional group that puts out optional rules that companies can opt into implementing for the sake of sabotaging something in such an esoteric way is complete conspiracy nonsense.

Edit - LOL, step one of my conspiracy and get a PhD and work at a company for 10 years using a programming language so I can get someone kicked off an optional committee! Brilliant plan, no notes!!!

Re:C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Beh... by Brian_K_White on Sunday November 24, 2024 @08:21AM (#42227793)
It is a valid comparison to expose the similarity of one thing that someone thinks is reasonable to another thing that everyone should recognize is not.

It is "LOL" to read that only literally.

Re:C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Beh... by gjvc on Sunday November 24, 2024 @09:24AM (#42228053)
Thank you; glad to see some people understand an analogy when they see one.
Re:C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Beh... by gatorized on Thursday November 28, 2024 @03:14PM (#42268264)
Not conspiracy nonsense, sorry.
Re:C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Beh... by CRConrad on Friday November 29, 2024 @09:34AM (#42274137)
> Yeah appealing to that book is literally conspiracy nonsense when you're talking about a group of engineers trying to do good engineering.

How is yelling "HOOBY, antisemitism!" about a perfectly innocuous title "trying to do good engineering"?

> That appeal fundamentally means that there are people trying to actively sabotage a thing

Well, if they aren't trying to, they're doing a damn fine unintentional job of it.