News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The 'Return to Office' Lies. Parent comment

Re:The 'Return to Office' Lies by AnimalMuppet on Saturday November 23, 2024 @12:38PM (#42222185)
You asked for examples about office work spreading disease, in the context of you saying that you hadn't seen the claim before. I took that as an unwillingness to believe the idea until you saw evidence. If that wasn't your point, I obviously didn't understand what you were trying to say, so could you clarify?

[Edit: I see that it could be read to be asking for examples of the claim that office work spreads disease in a piece arguing against RTO. Given that at this time, none of the direct replies read it that way, I'm going to say that it was at a minimum ambiguously worded...]

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The 'Return to Office' Lies by monocularvision on Saturday November 23, 2024 @01:24PM (#42222593)
Your edit is still wrong!

In context, the person was replying to someone who stated “I have read it all when it comes to RTO”. They stated they hadn’t seen a _blog post_ making _this point_ that RTO would cause more sickness. They were never addressing the claim that it does or does not. They were talking about the novelty of this argument for them.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The 'Return to Office' Lies by monocularvision on Saturday November 23, 2024 @12:53PM (#42222299)
You might want to slow down a bit and re-read what the person actually said in their comment.
[ Parent | on HN ]