Re:ICC issues warrants of arrest for Benjamin Netanyahu and ...
by freejazz on Thursday November 21, 2024 @01:28PM
(#42207148)
If you think it's a sham, why would you participate in the process? I don't agree that it is a sham, but it's an absurd principle to think that they'd have any interest in doing so.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:ICC issues warrants of arrest for Benjamin Netanyahu and ...
by megous on Thursday November 21, 2024 @02:02PM
(#42207471)
Israel already participates in the process. That's why they file documents with the court. Claims from two of those the pre-trial chamber rejected today, prior to issuing the warrants.
Re response: your claim was participation not jurisdiction, shift goalposts however you like
Re:ICC issues warrants of arrest for Benjamin Netanyahu and ...
by freejazz on Thursday November 21, 2024 @02:16PM
(#42207608)
Sure, and in American courts you can appear just for the purposes of disputing jurisdiction without submitting oneself to it.
Re:ICC issues warrants of arrest for Benjamin Netanyahu and ...
by ImPostingOnHN on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @12:37PM
(#42257923)
Disputing jurisdiction is submitting oneself to the court, so that the court may decide the issue of jurisdiction. If you submit such a jurisdictional dispute to the court for judgement, you tacitly agree to abide by the court's judgement in the dispute.
Here, the court made such a decision, Israel is just upset they didn't prevail. If Israel didn't think the court was allowed to rule on jurisdiction, Israel would not have submitted a petition for the court to do exactly that.