News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A binary tree of all Pythagorean triples by nyrikki on Thursday November 21, 2024 @12:07PM (#42206343)
Yes, but the binary projection does not according to the link.

345 and 435 would require two binary trees.

Re:A binary tree of all Pythagorean triples by AnotherGoodName on Thursday November 21, 2024 @01:01PM (#42206896)
I think skipping transposed values is fine though. You could just mirror the output at 45degrees for that if you wanted it. It does hit all distinct triples including the multiples of triples so it’s more inclusive of everything than the ternary tree.
Re:A binary tree of all Pythagorean triples by hakmem on Thursday November 21, 2024 @04:03PM (#42208633)
You can see both triples are contained in one binary tree using the big diagram in section 3. The triple [3 4 5] has the "path" RR. The triple [4 3 5] the path R.