News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Calculation Finds we are close to the Kessler Syndrom... by lmm on Thursday November 21, 2024 @01:56AM (#42201817)
> couldn't you just send a bunch of fortified rockets that absorb the debris during a collision but don't emit anything.

"Just" how? Orbital collisions happen at an average of 10km/s, you're going to make what, some kind of sponge that can get hit by a chunk of satellite going ~8x faster than a bullet and absorb it and slow it to a halt without fragmenting at all? Good luck.

> Do that a few times and then all other rockets just reuse the path that was cut?

Things in orbit are constantly moving, you can't "clear a path" any more than you can, IDK, make a safe route through a forest by walking through it once and moving any bears you encounter a couple of feet.

Re:New Calculation Finds we are close to the Kessler Syndrom... by RHSman2 on Thursday November 21, 2024 @03:59AM (#42202401)
I love this retort. Made my day.
Re:New Calculation Finds we are close to the Kessler Syndrom... by lupusreal on Thursday November 21, 2024 @05:34AM (#42202884)
A large mass of Whipple shields.

The "clearing a path" idea is inane, but we do know how to absorb hypervelocity debris impacts while generating a net negative amount of debris.

Re:New Calculation Finds we are close to the Kessler Syndrom... by ben_w on Thursday November 21, 2024 @06:20AM (#42203147)
Whipple shields fragment, don't they? They slow stuff down enough to not be a hazard to the thing being shielded, but if the goal is mess-reduction I don't see how that will help?

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Whipple-shield-concept_f...

Re:New Calculation Finds we are close to the Kessler Syndrom... by lupusreal on Thursday November 21, 2024 @09:33AM (#42204655)
The force of the impact effectively vaporizes part of the shield and the debris. Eventually the shield will be structurally unstable swiss cheese, but that can be modeled and the shield deorbited before it starts to fall apart.