Re:The shrimp welfare project
by xipho on Monday November 18, 2024 @10:19AM
(#42173120)
You didn't read the article nor follow the argument, just jumped in. It's about suffering shrimps, not saving shrimps.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The shrimp welfare project
by some_random on Monday November 18, 2024 @10:29AM
(#42173234)
Do shrimp not suffer from being consumed by whales?
Re:The shrimp welfare project
by eightysixfour on Monday November 18, 2024 @10:31AM
(#42173265)
In comparison to having their eyeballs crushed but left alive, or slowly frozen to death?
Re:The shrimp welfare project
by some_random on Monday November 18, 2024 @11:18AM
(#42173862)
The trade off here is eliminating mutilation, going from Pain + Death to just Death, or in the case of the whales, going from Death to normal, beautiful shrimp Life. I don't really have any interest in doing shrimp quality of life math this morning but there's clearly something there.
Re:The shrimp welfare project
by himinlomax on Monday November 18, 2024 @03:57PM
(#42176931)
I did. It was a whole lot of nothing.
In any case, I just wanted to point out that if you cared about the welfare of damn arthropods, you're going nowhere really fast.
Consider this: the quickest, surest, most efficient way and ONLY way to reduce all suffering on earth to nothing forever and ever is a good ole nuclear holocaust.
I said nothing about caring about arthropods. Side note, I do though, they are immensely important to our well being, without them we're not around, with them, we have trillions of dollars of mess to deal with. Again note that I said nothing about their feelings.
I feel you're still missing the point. I get you might be coming from a binary perspective, as evidenced by going to a nuclear argument, i.e. why bother talking about anything else, but I highly doubt that's the goal of the author. They are trying to make you imagine, and think, about how things fit together. YRMV.